Skip to content
Dave
Join Dave

Rugby: Champions Cup bonus-point rule explained after seven-try Connacht miss out against Saracens

Connacht missed out on an attacking bonus point despite scoring seven tries against Saracens because the new Champions Cup bonus-point rule rewards the difference between the teams’ try…

Connacht and Saracens players during their Champions Cup match

Connacht missed out on an attacking bonus point despite scoring seven tries against Saracens because the new Champions Cup bonus-point rule rewards the difference between the teams’ try totals.

Stuart Lancaster’s side won 45–36 in Galway on Saturday, but Saracens scored six tries themselves. Connacht therefore finished only one try ahead, short of the three-try margin required.

The result brought the Irish province four competition points for the victory. Saracens left with none.

What is the new Champions Cup bonus-point rule?

Under EPCR’s Champions Cup rules, a team earns an attacking bonus point by scoring at least three more tries than its opponent.

That replaces the previous requirement to score four tries, regardless of how many the opposition managed.

A win is worth four competition points and a draw two. The losing bonus point remains available to a team beaten by seven match points or fewer.

The distinction matters: the attacking bonus is determined by the difference in tries, while the losing bonus depends on the final score.

A team finishing four tries to one ahead qualifies for the attacking bonus. A team finishing four tries to two ahead does not.

Why did Connacht get no bonus point against Saracens?

Connacht’s seven tries were enough to win a remarkable game, but not enough to establish the required margin over Saracens’ six.

Ciarán Frawley and Cian Prendergast scored twice each, with Cathal Forde, Shamus Hurley-Langton and Caolin Blade also crossing, as covered in our Champions Cup opening-round roundup.

Their attacking output was only half the calculation. Conceding six tries left them with a difference of plus one.

Saracens could not claim an attacking bonus either, and the nine-point defeat put them outside the losing-bonus threshold.

Why did Glasgow earn one for the same number of tries?

Glasgow also scored seven tries, but conceded four in their 47–27 victory at Sale Sharks.

That three-try advantage met the requirement exactly. Warriors collected five competition points: four for winning and one for the attacking bonus.

The opening round produced several examples of why the tries conceded now matter.

Winning teamTries scoredTries concededTry differenceCompetition points
Connacht against Saracens76+14
Toulouse against Exeter76+14
Munster against Racing 9253+24
Glasgow against Sale74+35

Source: EPCR’s pool tables after round one. Try differences are calculated from the teams’ totals.

Toulouse’s 43–40 win over Exeter Chiefs also illustrates the separate losing bonus. Exeter earned one competition point because the final margin was three points.

Can a late try take away the attacking bonus?

Yes. A team leading the try count five to two would qualify if that remained the final tally. If its opponent scored again to make it five to three, the attacking bonus would disappear.

The extra point is therefore not secured simply by reaching a particular try total during the match.

For supporters following the pool standings, both sides’ try counts now need watching until the final whistle. Connacht’s opener showed why even seven tries can leave a winning team short of the maximum return.

Next articleSaracens 39-31 Newcastle: Six second-half tries overturn visitors’ lead